Sanctions for Notaries who Violate the Principle of Knowing the Users of Notary Services
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2024.v09.n03.010Keywords:
Notary, Sanctions, Principles of Recognizing Service UsersAbstract
This research discusses the regulation and stages in the principle of identifying users of notarial services, and sanctions for notaries who violate the principle of identifying users of notarial services. The type of research used is normative legal research with legislative and conceptual approaches. Sources and types of legal materials consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials used is through the secondary data collection method, namely literature study by examining legislation, journals, doctrines, articles, court decisions (jurisprudence), and other literature. The analysis of legal materials uses qualitative data analysis and is concluded using a deductive method. First, based on the research results, the regulation of the Principle of Identifying Users of Services is regulated in the Ministry of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 9 of 2017 concerning the Principle of Identifying Users of Notary Services, and Notaries as one of the reporting parties in the prevention and eradication of money laundering crimes regulated in Government Regulation Number 43 of 2015. In the stages of implementing the principle of identifying service users, notaries must conduct identification, verification, and monitoring as well as analyze the risks of service users in legal relationships with notaries. Second, the sanctions that can be imposed on notaries are not only administrative sanctions for violating the principle of identifying service users but also criminal sanctions.
References
Amiruddin, Z. A. (2016). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Cet. ke-9. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
Aziza, Q. A., & Damayanti, F. Y. (2022). Kewajiban Notaris Dalam Melaksanakan Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Ham tentang Penerapan Prinsip Mengenali Pengguna Jasa Bagi Notaris. Notaire, 5(2).
Budiono, H. (2007). Kumpulan tulisan hukum perdata di bidang kenotariatan. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Ilham, R. R., & Danil, E. (2020). Penerapan Prinsip Mengenali Pengguna Jasa oleh Notaris Dalam Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. UNES Journal of Swara Justisia, 3(4), 390–402.
Ismail, I., Fahamsyah, E., & Suarda, I. G. W. (2021). Kewajiban Notaris Mengenali Pengguna Jasa dalam Upaya Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang oleh Korporasi. Syntax Idea, 3(10), 2131–2147.
Khoidin, M. (2020). Hukum Notariat Di Indonesia(Suatu Pengantar Singkat). Laksbang Justitia, Yogyakarta.
Muhaimin. (2009). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram University Press, Mataram.
Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram University Press, Mataram.
Pandoman, A. (2017). Teori & Praktek Akta Perikatan Publisitas & Non Publisitas. PT. Raja Utama Kreasi: Jakarta.
Salim. (2021). Peraturan Jabatan Notaris. Sinar Grafika.
Siahaan, R. D. S., & Ilvira, M. L. (2023). Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Dalam Melaporkan Transaksi Keuangan Mencurigakan Melalui Aplikasi GoAML Dalam Upaya Mencegah dan Memberantas Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Jurnal Mimbar Ilmu Hukum (MIH), 1(1), 57– 71.
Soekanto, S. (2006). Pengantar penelitian hukum. Penerbit Universitas Indonesia (UI-Press).
Soekanto, S. (2007). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).