The Existence of Supreme Court Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia No. 02 of 2012 concerning the Adjustment of the Limitation of Minor Offences and the Amount of Fines in the Criminal Code Towards the Law Enforcement Process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2024.v09.n06.027Keywords:
Minor Offences, Fines in the Criminal Code, Law EnforcementAbstract
This research aims to analyze the position of Supreme Court Regulation No. 02 of 2012 in determining minor offenses in the criminal law enforcement process and to analyze the binding force of Supreme Court Regulation No. 02 of 2012 in law enforcement practice. The research method used is normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches. The research results show: 1) Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 of 2012 concerning the Adjustment of the Limitation of Minor Offences and the Amount of Fines in the Criminal Code is not included in the hierarchy of Laws and Regulations, but the Supreme Court Regulation is recognized as long as it is ordered by higher Laws and Regulations or formed based on authority, so the position of this Supreme Court Regulation is not equal or below the Law; 2) The Supreme Court Regulation is binding on the Police, Attorney General's Office, and Courts due to the signing of a Joint Memorandum of Agreement with the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia, the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia and the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia.
References
Serial online JDIH BPK RI Perma 02 Tahun 2012 dalam https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/209445/Perma-no-2-tahun-2012
Nur Solikin, Mencermati Pembentukan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung, dalam Jurnal Rechtsvinding, Februari 2017, hlm. 2.
Andi Hamzah, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta .Rineka Cipta. 1991,Hal. 70
Wirjono Prodjodikoro, Asas-asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia,Jakarta, PT. Eresc, cet. ke-3, 1981.Hal. 70
Marwan Mas, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Ghalia Indonesia, 2 Jakarta , 2004, hlm. 97.
Kasus Nenek Minah Pembuka Fenomena Penerapan Restorative Justice Serial online Available From:https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/kasus-nenek-minah--pembuka-fenomena-penerapan-restorative-justice-lt64ad8fa40c796/
Jujun S. Suriasumantri, Filsafat Ilmu, Sebuah Pengantar Populer, Pustaka Sinar Harapan, Jakarta, 2000, hlm. 93.
Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHP, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika, 2009, hlm. 99.
Abdul Hakim, Implementasi Perma Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 tentang Batasan Tindak Pidana Ringan Pada Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Kabupaten Labuhanbatu, Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi, Vol. 6, No. 2018, hlm 12.
Romli Atmasasmita, Sistem Peradilan Pidana (Criminal Justice System) Perspektif Ekstensiaalisme dan Abolisionalisme, Bina Cipta, Jakarta, hlm. 15.
Abdul Hakim, Implementasi Konsep Perma Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 Tentang Batasan Tindak Pidana Ringan Pada Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Kabupaten Labuhan Batu Bina Cipta, Bandung, hlm. 6
Atmasasmita, Romli, Sistem Peradilan Pidana Perspektif eksistensialisme dan abolisianisme.
Raymond Lontokan, Proses Penanganan Tindak Pidana Ringan Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana, Lex Ex Societatis, Vol.5, 2012, hlm. 18.
Abdul Hakim, Kusno, Implementasi Perma Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 Tentang Batasan Tindak Pidana Ringan Pada Sistem Peradilan Pidana Kbaupaten Labuhan Batu, Jurnal Ilmiah “Advokasi” Vol. 06, No. 2 September 2018, hlm. 9.
Abdul Hakim, Kusno, Implementasi Perma Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 Tentang Batasan Tindak Pidana Ringan Pada Sistem Peradilan Pidana Kbaupaten Labuhan Batu, Jurnal Ilmiah “Advokasi” Vol. 06, No. 2 September 2018, hlm. 18.
Mukti Arto, Konsepsi Ideal Mahkamah Agung, (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2001), hlm. 358.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).