Are Prospective Teachers Prepared for the New Normal- Reflections from Bihar, India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2024.v09.n08.003Keywords:
innovative method, internship, pandemic, teacher education, technologyAbstract
The global COVID-19 pandemic has led to a significant rethinking and restructuring of work practices across various sectors, including education. Teacher education, in particular, faced new challenges as technological interventions became essential for maintaining instructional continuity amidst social distancing requirements. This study focuses on the role of technology in preparing prospective teachers, with a specific emphasis on the internship experience, which is crucial for applying theoretical knowledge in practical settings. Through interviews with 115 student teachers and their affiliates in Patna, Bihar, India, the research investigates the extent to which technology and innovative, tech-assisted methods are utilized during these internships. A mixed-methods approach was used, combining thematic content analysis for qualitative data and basic statistical analysis for quantitative data. The results indicate that many prospective teachers do not effectively integrate technology during their practicum, often due to insufficient training or limited resources at their educational institutions or host schools. As a result, these teachers may rely more on informal, everyday learning rather than formal training when incorporating virtual tools in their teaching. The findings have implications not only for teacher education in Bihar and India but also for other regions facing similar challenges in the wake of the pandemic.
References
Alger, C., & Kopcha, T. J. (2010). Technology supported cognitive apprenticeship transforms the student teaching field experience: Improving the student teaching field experience for all triad members. The Teacher Educator, 46(1), 71-88.
Census of India. (2011). Census Statistics of Bihar. Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, New Delhi: India.
ChanLin, L. J., Hong, J. C., Horng, J. S., Chang, S. H., & Chu, H. C. (2006). Factors influencing technology integration in teaching: A Taiwanese perspective. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43(1), 57-68.
Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold & underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cuhadar, C. (2018). Investigation of Pre-Service Teachers' Levels of Readiness to Technology Integration in Education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(1), 61-75.
Farrell, E. (2020). Researching Lived Experience in Education: Misunderstood or Missed Opportunity? International Journal of Qualitative Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920942066
Gbemu, L. A., Sarfo, F. K., Adentwi, K. I., & Aklassu-Ganan, E. K. K. (2020). Teacher Educators' Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Actual Use of ICTs in Teaching in the Kumasi Metropolis. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 19(2), 13-23.
Gomez, L. M., Sherin, M. G., Griesdorn, J., & Finn, L.-E. (2008). Creating Social Relationships: The Role of Technology in Preservice Teacher Preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(2), 117–131.
Guru, G. (2020). Defending the Core Concepts. Economic and Political Weekly,55, 28-29.
Han, I., Shin, W. S., & Ko, Y. (2017). The effect of student teaching experience and teacher beliefs on pre-service teachers' self-efficacy and intention to use technology in teaching. Teachers and Teaching, 23(7), 829-842.
King,G., Keohane, R.O., and Verba, S. (1994). The Science in Social Science. In Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in QualitativeResearch (pp 1-33). New Jersey:Princeton University Press.
Kumar (1998). Freire's Legacy. Economic and Political Weekly,33(4),2912-2915.
_____(2020). A Regressive Syllabus Design. Economic and Political Weekly,55, 28-29.
LeCompte , M.D.(2000). Analyzing Qualitative Data. Theory Into Practice, 39( 3),146-154.
Liu, S.-H. (2012). A multivariate model of factors influencing technology use by pre-service teachers during practice teaching. Educational Technology & Society, 15, 137–149.
Mahende, G.A., and Mabuala, N. (2014). Is teaching practice for grading or improvement? Examining student teachers' perception and experience at the University of Dar es salaam, Tanzania. African Educational Research Journal, 2(1),1-11.
NCTE (2016). School Internship: Framework and Guidelines.. New Delhi: NCTE.
National Research Council. (2010). Preparing teachers: Building evidence for sound policy. Report by the Committee on the study of teacher preparation programs in the United States. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
Pandey, S. (2011). Professionalization of teacher education in India: A critique of Teacher Education Curriculum reforms and its effectiveness. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281935136 on 5th August 2018
Raj, A. (2020). Developing New Academic Model Post COVID-19 Pandemic [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RA8qhcqp-OE&t=6750s on 20th July 2020.
Rajput & Walia (1998). Assessing Teacher Effectiveness in India: Overview and Critical Appraisal. Prospects, 28(1),137-152.
Russell, M., Bebell, D., O'Dwyer, L., & O'Connor, K. (2003). Examining teacher technology use: Implications for pre-service and inservice teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 297-310.
Sadaf, A., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2012). Exploring pre-service teachers' beliefs about using Web 2.0 technologies in K-12 classroom. Computers & Education, 59(3), 937-945.
Sharma, V. (2015). Are BIMARU states still Bimaru. Economic and political weekly, 50(18), 58-63.
Shepherd, C., Rich, P., Wang, F., Deaton, B., Recesso, A., & Hannafin, M. (2005). Modeling of evidence-based practices: Technology integration in teacher education. In the annual meeting of the American Educational Researchers Association. Montreal, Canada.
Sinha, S., Banerji, R., & Wadhwa, W. (2016). Teacher performance in Bihar, India: Implications for education. The World Bank.
Teo, T., Chai, C. S., Hung, D., & Lee, C. B. (2008). Beliefs about teaching and uses of technology among pre‐service teachers. Asia‐Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(2), 163-174.
Ünal, E., Yamaç, A., & Uzun, A. M. (2017). The Effect of the Teaching Practice Course on Pre-Service Elementary Teachers' Technology Integration Self-Efficacy. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(3), 39-53.
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, (2020) COVID-19 Educational Disruption and Response. Retrieved from https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse on 20th April 2020.
Valencia, S. W., Martin, S. D., Place, N. A., & Grossman, P. (2009). Complex interactions in student teaching: Lost opportunities for learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(3), 304-322.
Wright, V. H., & Wilson, E. K. (2005). From preservice to inservice teaching: A study of technology integration. Journal of Computing in teacher Education, 22(2), 49-55.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).