Inequality and Interdependence: An Analogy of Caste and Sex

Authors

  • P.M.Suresh Kumar Department of Social Work, Don Bosco College, Thrissur-680651 INDIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2025.v10.n2.012

Keywords:

Inequality, Interdependence, Segmentation, Stratification, Caste, Sex

Abstract

Human beings are unequal primarily in terms of sex -- both in outward look and inner biological mechanism of sex. This smallest and broadest social stratification could be conceived as composed of two groups -- male and female. This sexual segregation among human beings plays a significant role in how they are represented in society. The difference in physique has long been a factor in discriminating them and connecting it to a chain of extraneous factors such as power, resources, and opportunities. The entire concept of patriarchy is built up on the premise that women are weak. Power, resources, and opportunities are unequally distributed across genders much like that of social groups such as class or caste.  All this has generated a deep-rooted inequality from time immemorial that the present-day civilization is trying hard to battle. Despite these, we find an apparent complementarity that exists to convert all the differences into one of interdependence. Inequality and interdependence are two mutually opposing forces, the former denoting a tone of disparage while the latter a sense of unification. The premise is almost like males are good as fathers while females are good as mothers. Role differentiation, skill sets, and mental make support this. These complementarities have converted differences of negatives into differences of positives. This paper is an attempt to visualize the facets of inequality among sexes and its complementarity to create interdependence, paving the way for social cohesion, and comparing it with a broader grouping namely caste.

Author Biography

P.M.Suresh Kumar, Department of Social Work, Don Bosco College, Thrissur-680651 INDIA

Dr. Suresh Kumar received his Master’s degree in Social Work from Loyola College, Trivandrum and Ph.D in Sociology from Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. He has vast experience of 18 years in teaching and research and served as Professor at Srinivas University, Mangalore and CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bangalore. He has published extensively on wide range of topics in peer reviewed journals.  Currently serving at Department of Social Work, Don Bosco College (Kerala).

References

Bowden, Peta & Mummery, Jaine (2012), Understanding Feminism, Rawat Publications, Jaipur.

Bordo, Susan (1993), Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body, University of California Press, Los Angeles.

Butler, Judith (1993), Bodies that Matter, Routledge, New York.

Chaudhuri, Maitrayee (ed.), (2018), Feminism in India- Issues in Contemporary Indian Feminism, Raj Press, New Delhi.

Fausto-Sterling, Anne (1985), Myth of Gender, Basic Books, New York.

Hochschild, Arlie (1989), The Second Shift, Penguin, New York.

Jones, Jackie& Jackson, Stevi (ed.), (2018), Contemporary Feminist Theories, Rawat Publications, New Delhi.

Kate (1994), Gender Outlaw: On Men, Women and the Rest of Us, Routledge, New York.

Mckie, Linda (2010), Families, Violence and Social Change, Tata Mc Graw Hill, New Delhi.

Morris, Jenny (1991), Pride Against Prejudice: Transforming Attitudes to Disability, Press, London.

Nussbaum, Maratha (1999), Sex and Social Justice, Oxford University Press, New York.

Rowbotham, Sheila (1992), Women in Movement: Feminism and Social Action, Routledge, New York.

Spender, Dale (1980), Man Made Language, Routledge & Kegan Paul, New York.

Vance, Carole.S (ed..), (1984), Pleasure and Danger: Exploiting Female Sexuality, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

Downloads

Published

18-02-2025

How to Cite

Suresh Kumar, P. (2025). Inequality and Interdependence: An Analogy of Caste and Sex. RESEARCH REVIEW International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 10(2), 114–119. https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2025.v10.n2.012